In this piece · 5 sections
The problem the index solves
Suppose a tool tells you a website is worth somewhere between a low and a high figure. On its own, that range floats. Is that good? Cheap? Risky? Without a reference point, a number is just a number — and most valuation tools hand you one and walk away.
The Comparative Value Index is our answer to that. It is not a new calculation. It is a way of placing the range the deterministic engine already produced next to anchors a person can feel — a stock multiple, a rental's cap rate, a parked domain's resale band — so the digital asset reads in context.
What the index does not do
Start with the guardrail, because it is the whole point. The index never moves the dollar figure. Our valuation firewall is strict: the range comes out of code, deterministically, and nothing downstream is allowed to nudge it. The index reads the band — it does not write it.
That separation matters. If a comparison layer could quietly inflate a number to make a site look like 'a bargain versus stocks,' the whole thing would be theater. So the index is read-only by design: it takes the finished range and finds the nearest familiar reference, nothing more.
How an anchor gets chosen
The right anchor depends on what kind of digital asset you handed us. A cash-flowing content site is best read against an earnings multiple. A SaaS product reads against revenue multiples. A parked domain reads against name-resale bands, not earnings at all. The index picks the anchor that matches the asset's mode.
Choosing the anchor is where the engine's mode detection earns its keep. We translate between these languages in how multiples compare across asset classes and the cap-rate inversion — both are the machinery underneath the index.
A purely illustrative reading
Here is the shape of an index reading, with made-up relative scores so nothing here is mistaken for market data. Suppose three things land in front of you: a content site, a broad-market stock index, and a rental. The chart below puts them on one invented 0-100 'how aggressively is this priced' scale — purely to show the format, not to quote anyone.
One invented scale, three anchors — format demo, not data
Read that as: on this invented scale, the site is priced less aggressively than the equity or rental anchors. The takeaway is the relationship, not the digits. A real reading would carry the engine's actual band and confidence score, with the anchors drawn from the asset's mode.
Why context beats a bare number
The reason we bother is simple: a band you can place is a band you can trust. When a range sits next to anchors you already understand, you can sanity-check it yourself — and a tool that invites you to sanity-check it is more honest than one that hands down a single confident figure.
That posture is the whole company. Conservative by default, a range not a point, sources named, and now a way to read the result against the rest of your financial life. The index is the last mile of that — context so the confidence interval lands.
